As developers we naturally look to make this kind of abstraction -
putting all the commons-like projects together. But that isn't what the
ASF is supposed to be about, which is communities.
My question is what community does [lang] or [betwixt] share with APR or
the C++ template library. I'd suggest pretty much none.
More than this is the question of oversight. Personally, I would not
feel comfortable sitting on a PMC with APR or C++ libraries being
released. I would have no measure by which to judge their release
worthiness, or to handle issues from them.
Stephen
Paul Benedict wrote:
Simon, my thoughts are the same. I don't see commons being exclusively
Java. Perhaps APR library and the C++ template would sit in here too.
Paul
simon wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 00:47 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'm sure there's stuff I've missed, but http://commons.apache.org is
now live and redirecting from Jakarta.
I'm still not at all happy about the "commons.apache.org" site being
taken over by pure java stuff.
Wasn't there some kind of agreement that if other non-java communities
wanted to form a commons then they could share the commons.apache.org
site? With the current website that is going to be pretty hard to do.
Regards,
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
