On 7/28/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Simon, my thoughts are the same. I don't see commons being exclusively
> > Java. Perhaps APR library and the C++ template would sit in here too.
>
> Disagreed. I can see, of course, that the idea of commons makes sense
> for other programming languages too. But, unlike in the case of
> logging, Axis, or comparable projects, I fail to see a connection. So
> I'd vote against increasing commons in that sense. I'd rather see a
> change of the name (commons-java, or whatever).

+1 or if theres a desire for the equivalent of a Commons in C++ - then
they just need to come up with a new/different project name.

Niall

> Jochen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to