On 7/28/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Simon, my thoughts are the same. I don't see commons being exclusively > > Java. Perhaps APR library and the C++ template would sit in here too. > > Disagreed. I can see, of course, that the idea of commons makes sense > for other programming languages too. But, unlike in the case of > logging, Axis, or comparable projects, I fail to see a connection. So > I'd vote against increasing commons in that sense. I'd rather see a > change of the name (commons-java, or whatever).
+1 or if theres a desire for the equivalent of a Commons in C++ - then they just need to come up with a new/different project name. Niall > Jochen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
