On 7/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon, my thoughts are the same. I don't see commons being exclusively > Java. Perhaps APR library and the C++ template would sit in here too.
Disagreed. I can see, of course, that the idea of commons makes sense for other programming languages too. But, unlike in the case of logging, Axis, or comparable projects, I fail to see a connection. So I'd vote against increasing commons in that sense. I'd rather see a change of the name (commons-java, or whatever). Jochen -- "Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resulting in a preventative effect against manipulating elections. The german government justifying the use of electronic voting machines and obviously believing that we don't need a police, because all illegal actions are forbidden. http://dip.bundestag.de/btd/16/051/1605194.pdf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
