On 7/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Simon, my thoughts are the same. I don't see commons being exclusively
> Java. Perhaps APR library and the C++ template would sit in here too.

Disagreed. I can see, of course, that the idea of commons makes sense
for other programming languages too. But, unlike in the case of
logging, Axis, or comparable projects, I fail to see a connection. So
I'd vote against increasing commons in that sense. I'd rather see a
change of the name (commons-java, or whatever).

Jochen


-- 
"Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resulting in
a preventative effect against manipulating elections.

The german government justifying the use of electronic voting machines
and obviously  believing that we don't need a police, because all
illegal actions are forbidden.

http://dip.bundestag.de/btd/16/051/1605194.pdf

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to