WiX (see http://wixtoolset.org/)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 24 February 2014 12:11
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> 
> Anyone, is there an open source windows installer tool ?
> 
> -abhi
> 
> 
> 
> On 21/02/14 2:30 pm, "Donal Lafferty" <donal.laffe...@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
> >I prefer the focus on support that comes with David's suggestion.
> >Targeting the latest stable release for a new platform greatly reduces
> >the number of permutations to test.
> >
> >Pursuing legacy systems limits the flexibility of ACS to evolve.  For
> >instance, we'll probably be on Java 7 in the next while, and W2K3
> >doesn't appear on the supported system list (see
> >https://www.java.com/en/download/help/sysreq.xml).  Likewise, older
> >versions of Internet Explorer can be quite different than what
> >Microsoft has recently published.
> >
> >My guess is that the engineering effort to get ACS working on a legacy
> >system makes sense as a consultancy service offered independent to ACS.
> >That's the case of OS/2 support ;)
> >
> >
> >DL
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alex Hitchins [mailto:alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com]
> >> Sent: 20 February 2014 14:29
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >>
> >> I agree totally, my point was that while there is nothing technically
> >>stopping  us going for w2k3 there is little reason to do so.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Alex Hitchins
> >>
> >> D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
> >>
> >> alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> >> Sent: 20 February 2014 13:24
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >>
> >> There's a difference in incidentally working and validated to work on.
> >> I'd limit focus to making sure it works on 2k12r2.
> >>
> >> --David
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Alex Hitchins
> >> <alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> >> > I can't think of anything that wouldn't be possible on W2k3 - that
> >>said It's
> >> old and I can't see people having a need for it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> > Alex Hitchins
> >> >
> >> > D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
> >> >
> >> > alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
> >> > Sent: 20 February 2014 11:17
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> >
> >> > Isn't the hyper-v support dependant on using 2012r2 ?
> >> >
> >> > So I don't know if I'd bother with going back as far as 2003
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Paul Angus
> >> > Cloud Architect
> >> > S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus
> >> > paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
> >> > Sent: 20 February 2014 11:13
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> >
> >> > AFAIK, it would be windows server 2k3, 2k8 2012, 2012R2.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Rajesh Battala
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com]
> >> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:32 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> >
> >> > One question I have is, Which version of windows we need to target?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks & Regards
> >> > Damodar/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com]
> >> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:04 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> >
> >> > I have tried to put all together in FS at
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+Win
> >> dowsfication as Feedback section and added my comments there.
> >> >
> >> > Please verify once and let me know if anything is to be added there.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks & Regards
> >> > Damodar/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com]
> >> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 12:32 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> >
> >> > Thank you all for your inputs.
> >> >
> >> >  I will aggregate all these things into FS  as appendix and will
> >> > put
> >>comments
> >> there instead of replying here one by one. Once I am done with update
> >>in FS  I will notify so that we can verify whether we are covering all
> >>or not.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks & Regards
> >> > Damodar/
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: abhisek basu [mailto:abhisekb...@msn.com]
> >> > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:16 AM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> >
> >> > Getting a Windows version will expand ACS reach to a large no of
> >> > audience and make it more OS independent from its core. As far as
> >> > the tools are concern, I am sure it's achievable, we have the most
> >> > enthusiastic community contributors behind :)
> >> >
> >> > Sent from my iPhone
> >> >
> >> >> On 16 Feb 2014, at 1:08 am, "Alex Hitchins"
> >> <alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I would guess that Windows has tools for managing a large number
> >> >> of
> >> Hyper-V hosts? I wonder what ACS would add to that.
> >> >>
> >> >> I still think it would be a very achievable goal and worth doing.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards
> >> >>
> >> >> Alex Hitchins
> >> >>
> >> >> D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
> >> >>
> >> >> alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
> >> >> Sent: 15 February 2014 18:49
> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> >>
> >> >> My view is that anyone who wants to use Hyper-V is very unlikely
> >> >> to
> >>want
> >> to have Linux based management servers lurking around, because I
> >>think  they'll be pretty wedded to Microsoft to want Hyper-V as the
> >>hypervisor. So  being able to deploy windows based management servers
> >>seems essential  to the use of Hyper-V (for better or worse).
> >> >>
> >> >> I think also there are probably a lot of Windows based Enterprises
> >>who
> >> also wouldn't like to a couple of stray Linux boxes running the show.
> >>I guess
> >> Microsoft think there is a market for Windows based private clouds or
> >>they  wouldn't have created the Behemoth that is the Azure Pack.
> >> >>
> >> >> ...and Apache Tomcat have managed to create a windows port - so
> >> >> how hard can it be? [tic]
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards
> >> >>
> >> >> Paul Angus
> >> >> Cloud Architect
> >> >> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
> >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> >> >> Sent: 15 February 2014 18:29
> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> >>
> >> >>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Alex Huang
> >> >>> <alex.hu...@citrix.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> I see this as that CS management server should run anywhere java
> >>runs.
> >> However, I see quite a few holes in this proposal.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> - Management server should never have mounted the NFS
> secondary
> >> storage.  We need to fix that.  Please have a talk with Kelven about
> >>this.  I  don't see us adding Samba to any machine that runs the
> >>management  server.  If this is just about seeding the system
> >>template, it can be done as  part of installation rather than
> >>management server.
> >> >>> - If I truly think about Windowsification, I think windows
> >>installer,
> >> windows service, opening ports in windows firewall.  I don't see any
> >>of that  here.  Or else it's useless for windows people.
> >> >>>        - For java, most people write a windows service that
> >>launches the
> >> jvm and keeps track of the jvm.
> >> >>> - There's a number of things that CloudStack management server
> >> >>> does
> >> today at startup that should not be there and those are what
> >>complicates the
> >> windowfication.   These things should be moved out of the management
> >> server and into installation.  What should be inside the management
> >>server  startup procedure should be checks, rather than generations.
> >>It should  check for ssh key exists and the database version matches
> >>etc but it should  not do the following.
> >> >>>        - Upgrade of the database
> >> >>>        - ssh key generation
> >> >>>        - iso generation.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --Alex
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> A couple of more to add to the list.
> >> >> There isn't really a good binary software dependency resolution
> >> >> framework for Windows (at least not that I am aware of) and you
> >> >> potentially need lots of different things - mysql libraries,
> >> >> python, ipmitool, or another shell to execute shell scripts. Look
> >> >> at the list of the dependencies we install in the RPMs for an idea
> >> >> of things that are missing. Is the plan to bundle those in the
> >> >> binaries? (If so, we need to be having a serious discussion around
> >> >> a shift of a number system requirements to dependencies which may
> >> >> or may not be
> >> >> acceptable.) With what appears to be some serious refactoring in
> >> >> how
> >>the
> >> management server works that Alex outlines and I doubt this is a
> >>short term  goal. (e.g. 4.4 timeframe). If you are going to take on
> >>all of the refactoring  work, please start by building tests that
> >>prove that it all works today and then  verify the same behavior in
> >>the refactored work.
> >> >>
> >> >> --David
> >> >> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
> >> >> Our CloudStack Infrastructure
> >> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> >> offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
> >> >>
> >> >> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
> >> >>
> >> >> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1
> >> >> training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >> >> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil.
> >> >> Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >> >> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led,
> >> >> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >> >> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led,
> >> >> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >> >> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led,
> >> >> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >> >> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led,
> >> >> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >> >>
> >> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >>intended
> >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> >>views or  opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> >>necessarily  represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
> >>If you are not the  intended recipient of this email, you must neither
> >>take any action based  upon its contents, nor copy or show it to
> >>anyone. Please contact the sender if  you believe you have received
> >>this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a  company incorporated in
> >>England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a  company
> >>incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape  Blue
> >>Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> >>Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is
> >>a  registered trademark.
> >> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >>intended
> >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> >>views or  opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> >>necessarily  represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
> >>If you are not the  intended recipient of this email, you must neither
> >>take any action based  upon its contents, nor copy or show it to
> >>anyone. Please contact the sender if  you believe you have received
> >>this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a  company incorporated in
> >>England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a  company
> >>incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape  Blue
> >>Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> >>Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is
> >>a  registered trademark.
> >> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >>intended
> >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> >>views or  opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> >>necessarily  represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
> >>If you are not the  intended recipient of this email, you must neither
> >>take any action based  upon its contents, nor copy or show it to
> >>anyone. Please contact the sender if  you believe you have received
> >>this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a  company incorporated in
> >>England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a  company
> >>incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape  Blue
> >>Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> >>Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is
> >>a  registered trademark.
> >> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >>intended
> >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> >>views or  opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> >>necessarily  represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
> >>If you are not the  intended recipient of this email, you must neither
> >>take any action based  upon its contents, nor copy or show it to
> >>anyone. Please contact the sender if  you believe you have received
> >>this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a  company incorporated in
> >>England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a  company
> >>incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape  Blue
> >>Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> >>Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is
> >>a  registered trademark.
> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >>intended  solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> >>addressed. Any views or  opinions expressed are solely those of the
> >>author and do not necessarily  represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or
> >>related companies. If you are not the  intended recipient of this
> >>email, you must neither take any action based  upon its contents, nor
> >>copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if  you believe
> >>you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a  company
> >>incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> >>company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
> >>Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated
> >>in  Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
> >>ShapeBlue is a  registered trademark.

Reply via email to