On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:57:31PM -0500, Raul D. Miller wrote:
> > I think it should, in fact. HOWEVER, there is no constitutional provision
> > AT THIS TIME for it. Fact is, gecko has NO AUTHORITY to single-handedly
> > alter the constitution in practice like this.
>
> Fact is?
>
> Fact is -- there was quite a dispute on debian-vote, about how to
> interpret the constitition with respect to John's proposal. Guess whose
> responsibility it is to adjudicate when something like that happens?
>
> Better yet, don't guess. Read the constitution, and find out.
>
> Then come back and respond to your post, with that in mind.
I would reasonably assume (obviously a mistake when dealing with
bureacracies) that if the secretary needs to make a decision, they should
interpret the constitution, not throw it out and do whatever the hell they
want.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
<ultima> netgod: My calculator has more registers than the x86, and
-thats- sad
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
