Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

[Santiago Vila]

> The problem is:
> 
>       (a) A group of developers don't think the social contract can
>           legally (according to the constitution) be modified
>       (b) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
>           should require a supermajority
>       (c) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
>           by simple majority is perfectly reasonable and legal under the
>           constitution

So, the real problem is:

* Our constitution is incomplete because there is not a constitutional
way to determine whether something is constitutional or not. We would need
to amend it and create a "constitutional court of justice".


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]