Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

[Santiago Vila]

I wrote:
> * Our constitution is incomplete because there is not a constitutional
> way to determine whether something is constitutional or not. We would need
> to amend it and create a "constitutional court of justice".

Ooops! I have just been pointed out that this is not true, because of
constitution 7.1 point 3: "The Secretary adjudicates any disputes
about interpretation of the constitution.".

I think I would support a change in the constitution so that this is
decided by a group of persons.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]