At 02:28 PM 9/27/00 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > The problem is:
> >
> > (a) A group of developers don't think the social contract can
> > legally (according to the constitution) be modified
> > (b) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
> > should require a supermajority
> > (c) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
> > by simple majority is perfectly reasonable and legal under the
> > constitution
>
>So, the real problem is:
>
>* Our constitution is incomplete because there is not a constitutional
>way to determine whether something is constitutional or not. We would need
>to amend it and create a "constitutional court of justice".
What about Article 7, Section 1, Clause 3?
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
