On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:44:07PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote: > I think it should, in fact. HOWEVER, there is no constitutional provision > AT THIS TIME for it. Fact is, gecko has NO AUTHORITY to single-handedly > alter the constitution in practice like this. Fact is? Fact is -- there was quite a dispute on debian-vote, about how to interpret the constitition with respect to John's proposal. Guess whose responsibility it is to adjudicate when something like that happens? Better yet, don't guess. Read the constitution, and find out. Then come back and respond to your post, with that in mind. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Manoj Srivastava
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure John Goerzen
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Santiago Vila
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Buddha Buck
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Santiago Vila
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joseph Carter
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Ean R . Schuessler
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joseph Carter
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Raul D. Miller
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Joseph Carter
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Drake Diedrich
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Raul Miller
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Mark Brown
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Ean R . Schuessler
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Seth Arnold
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Mark Brown
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Raul Miller
- Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure Manoj Srivastava