Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

[Joseph Carter]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 04:34:38PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Ooops! I have just been pointed out that this is not true, because of
> > constitution 7.1 point 3: "The Secretary adjudicates any disputes
> > about interpretation of the constitution.".
> 
> And I for one am a supported of John's resolution *and* I think that
> the Secretary has made a very wise decision in this regard.

I'm in opposition to it (technical grounds, though I think the idea is a
good one at some point) and am opposed to the decision's precedent.  =/

-- 
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>               GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/)         20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/)   44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3

<KatanaJ> Note on a chem lab fridge- "This refrigerator is not explosion-
          proof".


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]