Vicente Carrasco -Bixen- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
ca> My point is: in my language (not in DocBook, in my mother thonge) ca> using <quote> or « is simply a matter of taste in each moment. I ca> can't figure why is so important to you. What I can tell you is that ca> is not so important for me. There is a large difference between <quote> and « even if the rendering result is almost the same. It is not based on my personal preference. From viewpoint of SGML, using « is wrong. If you need to change the quotation mark, please use more reasonable way to do so. ca> But I find useful the have those two kinds of quotation marks. If I ca> can use them, why I would use just one? I could not read you said the reason why you use « was you want to use two kinds of quotation marks, from the previous email. I have no intention of denying to use two (or more) kinds of quotation marks but I object to convert <quote> to « for that purpose without compelling reason. It is a kind of violation of separation of the logical structure and the rendering results, which SGML aims to. ca> By the way, I like bikesheds in magenta. This is not a bikeshed matter. -- | Hiroki SATO
pgpjwZUCxSzWX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
