Gábor Kövesdán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
ga> Giorgos Keramidas escribió: ga> > On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:39:27 +0000 (UTC), "J. Vicente Carrasco" ga> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ga> > ga> >> carvay 2008-11-07 09:39:27 UTC ga> >> ga> >> FreeBSD doc repository ga> >> ga> >> Modified files: ga> >> es_ES.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports chapter.sgml ga> >> Log: ga> >> Cosmetic change: ga> >> ga> >> s/<quote>/«/g ga> >> s/<\quote>/»/g ga> >> ga> >> Revision Changes Path ga> >> 1.15 +22 -22 doc/es_ES.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports/chapter.sgml ga> >> ga> > ga> > Isn't <quote> a higher-level, semantic tag? ga> > ga> > I think we can convince jade to output « by tweaking the es_ES ga> > DSSSL code, instead of using explicit tagging in the text itself :) ga> > ga> I considered this before suggesting the current solution and I thought ga> that <quote> didn't have a real semantic meaning in such uses, because ga> it doesn't mean citation from an original text, it just means "quoted ga> text" in those occurrences. For example, if we had citations from ga> FreeBSD or IT-related books, it would be a loss of semantic ga> information then, but while we use it for quoting special terms I ga> consider this an acceptable solution. But this is just my opinion and ga> apart from this, it would be nice to modify the DSSSL stylesheet to ga> have these latin quotation marks at default. I think using <quote> instead of &[lr]aquo; is more reasonable. The <quote> element in DocBook is just for in-line text with quotation marks, not implying either citation or other semantics. So, if you just want to add quotation marks around a text, not for emphasizing it, using <quote> is the right way. -- | Hiroki SATO
pgpELJEySkHPT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
