core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Re: RFR: 8383724: C2: Implement AddI128T and SubI128T [v3] Quan Anh Mai
• RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v2] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v3] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v4] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v5] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v6] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389634: Overflow in SequenceLayoutImpl.reshape leads to ArithmeticException (division by zero) instead of IllegalArgumentException [v6] Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8384062: Add a new method List::removeAt to avoid overload confusion [v6] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8384062: Add a new method List::removeAt to avoid overload confusion [v5] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v3] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v3] Eric Fang
• RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Galder Zamarreño
• RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: javac/javap --preview-mode handling need to be more robust Alex Buckley
  • Re: RFR: 8389654: BaseFileManager --preview-mode handling need to be more robust [v2] Chen Liang
• Integrated: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner Brent Christian
• Re: RFR: 8371795: Improve documentation of Class.isInstance [v8] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8371795: Improve documentation of Class.isInstance [v7] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8371795: Improve documentation of Class.isInstance [v6] Chen Liang
• Withdrawn: 8386113: Link BigDecimal.toPlainString to Algorithmic Complexity section duke
• [jdk27] RFR: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Christoph Langer
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Christoph Langer
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Matthias Baesken
  • [jdk27] Withdrawn: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Christoph Langer
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8375623: Excessive disk space usage of jpackage and jlink tests in debug builds after JDK-8373246 Christoph Langer
• RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8337680: failure_handler does not handle repeated commands well Shiv Shah
• Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v7] Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v7] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v7] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v3] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v4] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] duke
  • Integrated: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale by1361092
• RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v16] Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v3] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v3] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v6] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v7] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v8] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v9] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v9] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v9] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v10] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v10] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v10] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v10] Marc Chevalier
  • Integrated: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v114] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388400: Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8388400: Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Jatin Bhateja
  • Integrated: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Jatin Bhateja
• Withdrawn: 8374154: Rewrite JAAS NTLoginModule with FFM duke
• RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v3] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v3] Paul Hübner
  • Integrated: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError David Holmes
• RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Chen Liang
• RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
• Withdrawn: 8317278: JVM implementation of value objects David Simms
• Withdrawn: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects David Simms
• Withdrawn: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value objects David Simms
• Integrated: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) David Simms
• Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
• RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Jean-Noël Rouvignac
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v4] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v4] Stuart Marks
• RFR: 8389466: Clarify Class::desiredAssertionStatus for primitive and array types Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389466: Clarify Class::desiredAssertionStatus for primitive and array types Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389466: Clarify Class::desiredAssertionStatus for primitive and array types [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389466: Clarify Class::desiredAssertionStatus for primitive and array types [v2] Alan Bateman

• Earlier messages
• Later messages