core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8355524: Only every second line in upgradeable files is being used Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8355524: Only every second line in upgradeable files is being used Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355524: Only every second line in upgradeable files is being used Severin Gehwolf
  • Integrated: 8355524: Only every second line in upgradeable files is being used Severin Gehwolf
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v7] Michael McMahon
• RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache Erik Österlund
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache Erik Österlund
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v4] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v4] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v4] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v4] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v4] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v4] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v4] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v5] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v6] Erik Österlund
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v7] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v7] Zhengyu Gu
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v7] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v7] Zhengyu Gu
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v8] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v8] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v8] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v8] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v8] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v8] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v8] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v8] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v9] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v9] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v9] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v9] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache [v9] Ioi Lam
  • Integrated: 8354897: Support Soft/Weak Reference in AOT cache Ioi Lam
• Re: RFR: 8347408: Create an internal method handle adapter for system calls with errno [v3] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8347408: Create an internal method handle adapter for system calls with errno [v5] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8347408: Create an internal method handle adapter for system calls with errno [v4] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Luca Kellermann
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Luca Kellermann
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v78] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8355475: UNCTest should use an existing UNC path Eirik Bjørsnøs
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v77] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v77] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v77] Per Minborg
• RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value [v2] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Brian Burkhalter
  • Integrated: 8355443: [java.io] Use @requires tag instead of exiting based on File.separatorChar value Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8297727: Forcing LF interpretation lead to StackOverflowError in reflection code Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8297727: Forcing LF interpretation lead to StackOverflowError in reflection code Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8297727: Forcing LF interpretation lead to StackOverflowError in reflection code Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8297727: Forcing LF interpretation lead to StackOverflowError in reflection code Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8297727: Forcing LF interpretation lead to StackOverflowError in reflection code Chen Liang
• RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v4] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v5] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v6] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v7] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v7] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v7] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v7] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v7] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls [v8] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: 8349146: [REDO] Implement a better allocator for downcalls Per Minborg
• Withdrawn: 8347408: Create an internal method handle adapter for system calls with errno duke
• Namespace Prefix Issue in XML to XSL Transformation Hempushpa Sahu
  • Re: Namespace Prefix Issue in XML to XSL Transformation Johannes Döbler
  • Re: Namespace Prefix Issue in XML to XSL Transformation Joe Wang
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v76] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v76] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v76] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v76] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v75] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier [v35] Thomas Schatzl
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v74] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v74] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v74] Per Minborg
• RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8355369: Remove setAccessible usage for setting final fields in java.util.concurrent Viktor Klang
• JDK-8355338: ZIP and non-compliant entry names Lars Bruun-Hansen
  • Re: JDK-8355338: ZIP and non-compliant entry names Alan Bateman
  • Re: JDK-8355338: ZIP and non-compliant entry names Lars Bruun-Hansen
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v73] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v73] Per Minborg
• Withdrawn: 8347009: Speed ​​up parseInt and parseLong duke
• Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs [v2] Julian Waters
• Re: RFR: 8342206: Convenience method to check if a constant pool entry matches nominal descriptors [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8342206: Convenience method to check if a constant pool entry matches nominal descriptors [v2] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8342206: Convenience method to check if a constant pool entry matches nominal descriptors [v2] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8342206: Convenience method to check if a constant pool entry matches nominal descriptors Chen Liang
• RFR: 8354877: DirectClassBuilder default flags should include ACC_SUPER Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354877: DirectClassBuilder default flags should include ACC_SUPER Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354877: DirectClassBuilder default flags should include ACC_SUPER Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8354877: DirectClassBuilder default flags should include ACC_SUPER Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354877: DirectClassBuilder default flags should include ACC_SUPER Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8354877: DirectClassBuilder default flags should include ACC_SUPER Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354877: DirectClassBuilder default flags should include ACC_SUPER Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8354877: DirectClassBuilder default flags should include ACC_SUPER Chen Liang
• RFR: 8355335: Avoid pattern matching switches in core ClassFile API Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355335: Avoid pattern matching switches in core ClassFile API Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355335: Avoid pattern matching switches in core ClassFile API Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8355335: Avoid pattern matching switches in core ClassFile API Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8355335: Avoid pattern matching switches in core ClassFile API Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355335: Avoid pattern matching switches in core ClassFile API Abdelhak Zaaim
• RFR: 8350703: Add standard system property stdin.encoding Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8350703: Add standard system property stdin.encoding Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8350703: Add standard system property stdin.encoding Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8350703: Add standard system property stdin.encoding [v2] Stuart Marks

• Earlier messages
• Later messages