core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8367938: Test Serialization Compatibility of Class Objects Brent Christian
• RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Hannes Greule
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v4] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v6] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v6] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v7] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v8] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v8] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v8] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v8] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v8] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v8] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Hannes Greule
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v9] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v10] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v10] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v11] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Stuart Monteith
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Stuart Monteith
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Stuart Monteith
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Stuart Monteith
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Stuart Monteith
  • Re: RFR: 8371260: Improve scaling of downcalls using MemorySegments allocated with shared arenas. Jorn Vernee
• RFR: 8372787: ModulePatcher$PatchedModuleReader throws unspecified IllegalStateException upon being invoked after close() Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModulePatcher$PatchedModuleReader throws unspecified IllegalStateException upon being invoked after close() Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModulePatcher$PatchedModuleReader throws unspecified IllegalStateException upon being invoked after close() [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v6] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8372787: ModuleReader should throw IOException consistently when using --patch-module and ModuleReader is closed Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v4] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v4] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
• Re: RFR: 8360046: Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks [v23] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8360046: Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks [v23] Viktor Klang
• Integrated: 8369432: Add Support for JDBC 4.5 MR Lance Andersen
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v29] fabioromano1
• RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v2] Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v2] Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v2] Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v3] Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v3] Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v4] Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v5] Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v6] Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v6] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v7] Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v7] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v7] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL [v7] Patrick Strawderman
  • Integrated: 8179918: EnumSet spliterator should report SORTED, ORDERED, NONNULL Patrick Strawderman
• Question about method references David Alayachew
  • Re: Question about method references David Alayachew
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v28] fabioromano1
• RFR: 8372615: Many container tests fail when running rootless on cgroup v1 Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8372615: Many container tests fail when running rootless on cgroup v1 David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8372615: Many container tests fail when running rootless on cgroup v1 [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8372615: Many container tests fail when running rootless on cgroup v1 [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8372615: Many container tests fail when running rootless on cgroup v1 [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372615: Many container tests fail when running rootless on cgroup v1 [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8372615: Many container tests fail when running rootless on cgroup v1 [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372615: Many container tests fail when running rootless on cgroup v1 [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8372615: Many container tests fail when running rootless on cgroup v1 [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Integrated: 8372615: Many container tests fail when running rootless on cgroup v1 Casper Norrbin
• Re: RFR: 8361207: Build native Windows ARM64 MSI packages Chayan
• RFR: 8372710: Update ProcessBuilder/Basic regex Harshit470250
  • Re: RFR: 8372710: Update ProcessBuilder/Basic regex Harshit470250
  • Re: RFR: 8372710: Update ProcessBuilder/Basic regex Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8372710: Update ProcessBuilder/Basic regex Harshit470250
  • Re: RFR: 8372710: Update ProcessBuilder/Basic regex Amit Kumar
• RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v4] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v4] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v5] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v6] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v7] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v7] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v7] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v7] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8372696: Allow boot classes to explicitly opt-in for final field trusting [v7] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8328821: Map.of() derived view collection mutators should throw UnsupportedOperationException [v15] Liam Miller-Cushon

• Earlier messages
• Later messages