In message
<262b2f900902010529r2ddec4afq31705bd9ccfda...@mail.gmail.com>, Erik van
der Werf <erikvanderw...@gmail.com> writes
< snip >
Something else for the discussion. I would like to have a rule about
mandatory displaying the thinking process of the program so that both
operators have an idea of what is happening. Especially for remote
play I think this is needed because now it is just too trivial to
cheat.
I understand the need to try to avoid cheating. But I am sceptical about
the effectiveness of this method.
1.) A neural net cannot explain its "thinking process" because it does
not have any.
2.) It would still be too easy to cheat. The cheater could run a
program which looks at the position and generates a plausible "display
of its thinking process", while a professional player thinks and then
tells it where to play. Then the program generates more "display of
thinking process" tending to support the recommended move, before
playing it.
<snip>
Nick
--
Nick Wedd n...@maproom.co.uk
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
