Moreover, this is a really complicated issue. There has been some extensive statistical work on human cheating in chess done by Ken Regan at the University at Buffalo. However, this relies heavily upon the fact that computers dominate human play by a wide margin.
The same is not the case in go. s. On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Robert Jasiek <jas...@snafu.de> wrote: > Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >> If a program under no circumstance can reproduce a specific move and that >> for several occasions, then that's very clear proof of course. > > [...] >> >> Statistics prove everything here. > > No. Rather it proves that the program cheats OR that the methods of > detecting cheating are improper. > >> One always must have a logfile > > Good. > > -- > robert jasiek > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
