>> Mark Boon: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Opposed to removing 9x9. >>> In favor of adding 13x13 wthout removing 9x9. >>> > Hideki Kato wrote: >> Me too. If, however, limited two 9x9 and 13x13 might be better now as >> 19x19 is not so utilized, IMHO. It's just early this year many >> programs started being running on 9x9. > > Rémi Coulom wrote: > I second that suggestion of replacing 19x19 cgos by 13x13 cgos. For > 19x19, I prefer KGS, it is a lot more interesting.
+1. 9x9 play doesn't include some features of the game on the larger board size, but 19x19 is too big too experiment with some brute-force ideas on today's hardware. I believe 13x13 is the perfect test-bed for the next algorithmic breakthrough. Darren -- Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer http://dcook.org/mlsn/ (English-Japanese-German-Chinese-Arabic open source dictionary/semantic network) http://dcook.org/work/ (About me and my work) http://darrendev.blogspot.com/ (blog on php, flash, i18n, linux, ...) _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
