On Jul 31, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am working on a plan to possibly be able to run 2 boardsizes on Dave
Dyers boardspace site. If this plan works out, obviously 9x9 is
very
popular and we will keep it. The only questions is what should the
other board size be. It is starting to appear than 19x19 is the
second
most popular for computer go.
7x7 is interesting to me for a few reasons:
• It was "solved" by some dans a while back. This gives a perfect
fuseki database and measurably correct and incorrect evaluations
• 7x7 < 64, so bitboards could be extremely effective.
- Don
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 09:49 -0600, Markus Enzenberger wrote:
David Fotland wrote:
I prefer keeping 9x9. We have 9x9 for quick testing of changes
(because the
games are fast), and 19x19 for testing play on a full board. I
don't think
13x13 adds anything. It's slower, so I would still use 9x9 for
quick tests.
It's not a board size that anyone uses, so I would still use 19x19
to test
for full boards.
I agree. 9x9 and 19x19 are the most popular board sizes and the only
ones used in Computer Go tournaments.
I think the participation on the 19x19 CGOS would be higher if it
wasn't
down so often. Sometimes the server does not work for days,
sometimes
it is only the result pages on the web, which are not updated. I
think
it would be very helpful to have an 19x19 server with a higher
uptime.
Unfortunately I cannot offer to run one myself.
- Markus
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
