On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 08:31 +0900, Darren Cook wrote: > >> Mark Boon: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> Opposed to removing 9x9. > >>> In favor of adding 13x13 wthout removing 9x9. > >>> > > Hideki Kato wrote: > >> Me too. If, however, limited two 9x9 and 13x13 might be better now as > >> 19x19 is not so utilized, IMHO. It's just early this year many > >> programs started being running on 9x9. > > > > Rémi Coulom wrote: > > I second that suggestion of replacing 19x19 cgos by 13x13 cgos. For > > 19x19, I prefer KGS, it is a lot more interesting. > > +1. 9x9 play doesn't include some features of the game on the larger > board size, but 19x19 is too big too experiment with some brute-force > ideas on today's hardware. I believe 13x13 is the perfect test-bed for > the next algorithmic breakthrough.
I actually would prefer working our way up, doing 11x11 next but that is sure to be unpopular I think. 11x11 is still a far more complex game than 9x9. So I'm in a quandary now. A lot of votes between 13x13 and 19x19 for the second server. I guess when we decide that we will have to argue over time-control :-) - Don > Darren > > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
