I found the graph,  but I can't find the data and the details,  although
it will be on one of the postings.  I think this was at least a year
ago, perhaps 2.   

Here is what I remember:

I played 11 different levels,  each a doubling of the previous.   The
weakest level I think was just 1024 play-outs.    I ran the study for
weeks in order to get substantial data points even from the highest
levels.    The highest level,  took a significant time to play a single
game,  several times longer than the CGOS time control which was 10
minutes at the time.  

The conditions were CGOS 9x9 conditions - komi 7.5,  and so on, just
like CGOS 9x9.

I actually tested 2 basic versions,  one with heavy play-outs and one
with light play-outs.   The light play-out version basically plays
random games.

Both programs were reasonably strong UCT programs - versions of Lazarus
which probably would play at least 2100 strength on my current computer
on the current 5 minute server.  

See if this link works to see the graph:

    http://greencheeks.homelinux.org:8015/~drd/study.jpg   

The X axis represents the number of doublings and ELO ratings are on the
Y axis.

- Don






Michael Williams wrote:
> Don Dailey wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> I wasn't stating a precise value for a doubling when I said 100
>> ELO.    But it appears that it is actually worth a bit more than 100
>> ELO for a
>> doubling.        I did a massive study of this at one point a year or
>> more ago with thousands of games with UCT based Lazarus program and the
>> strength improvement per doubling was very  clear and impressive.    
>
> Don, what komi did you use when you did that study?  Looking in the
> archives, all I can find is you saying that komi=9 is correct.  So
> does that mean 8.5 or 9.5?  Or did you allow draws?
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to