If it is more than the sum of its components, what does it add? What are you missing that couldn't be done in a component or template, that other languages have because they have frameworks?
On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 1:02:56 AM UTC+2, g vim wrote: > > On 03/05/2015 23:55, James Reeves wrote: > > On 3 May 2015 at 23:36, gvim <gvi...@gmail.com <javascript:> > > <mailto:gvi...@gmail.com <javascript:>>> wrote: > > > > Yes, I do program in Clojure. Exclusively at the moment as I'm > > currently free to work on my own startup project. I'm using Luminus > > and enjoy it so I didn't start this thread out of dissatisfaction > > with Luminus itself but more from a sense of frustration at seeing > > so little input coming from the community compared with other > languages. > > > > > > By what measurement? > > > > - James > > I posted some figures at the beginning of this thread where I was > comparing frameworks, not components. A framework is more than the sum > of it's components so I don't think comparing Ring and Compojure to > Phoenix or Play is relevant. Clojure frameworks aren't the only ones > built from components. > > gvim > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
