Hi,

Reading through all the discussion I don't get which features you are 
actually missing. I love luminus and did a lot with it, however, for me it 
was missing some standard stuff, that's why I put together closp, which is 
just another leiningen template providing some more features out of the box.
I'd consider adding even more features if you would become more specific in 
terms of features.

For the rest I agree with what is mostly said here, the beauty of clojure 
lies in the nature of small composable building blocks and the same goes 
for frameworks, so, basically it's all there, one just has to put it 
together. And to not have to put it together by hand time and time again 
there are leiningen templates.

Best Regards,
Sven

Am Samstag, 2. Mai 2015 22:43:53 UTC+2 schrieb g vim:
>
> I recently did some research into web frameworks on Github. Here's what 
> I found: 
>
>
> FRAMEWORK       LANG          CONTRIBUTORS         COMMITS 
>
> Luminus        Clojure            28        678 
> Caribou        Clojure             2        275 
>
> Beego        Golang            99        1522 
>
> Phoenix        Elixir              124        1949 
>
> Yesod        Haskell           130        3722 
>
> Laravel        PHP                268        4421 
>
> Play                Scala               417        6085 
>
> Symfony        PHP                1130        20914 
>
> Rails        Ruby               2691        51000 
>
>
> One could conclude from this that the Clojure community isn't that 
> interested in web development but the last Clojure survey suggests 
> otherwise. Clojure's library composition approach to everything only 
> goes so far with large web applications, as Aaron Bedra reminded us in 
> March last year: www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBL59w7fXw4 . Less manpower 
> means less momentum and more bugs. Furthermore, I have a hunch that 
> Clojure's poor adoption as indicated by Indeed.com maybe due to this 
> immaturity in the web framework sphere. Why is it that Elixir, with a 
> much smaller community and lifespan than Clojure's, has managed to put 4 
> times as much mindshare into its main web framework when its module 
> output, as measured by modulecounts.com, is a tiny fraction of Clojure's? 
>
> gvim 
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to