On 4 May 2015 at 00:51, Jason Whitlark <ja...@whitlark.org> wrote: > > While I agree that g vim's metrics aren't terribly meaningful, the > conclusion he's arriving at is an important one. I've heavily used Clojure > in production for years, and there have been a number of times where having > to hand assemble everything cost lots of support from other engineers. > Luminus is an improvement, but doesn't always generate correct code for > specific sets of options, and is tricky to extend. >
I don't disagree. Improving code generation was my motivation for writing lein-generate, and my partial motivation for cljfmt. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
