> While I agree that g vim's metrics aren't terribly meaningful, the conclusion he's arriving at is an important one.
I think g vim's metrics have some impact with management. Certainly, its worth talking about. A few months ago I was talking to the woman at the New York Times who overseas the NYT store, and they had decided to go with PHP because it had the Magento shopping cart. Personally, I think Magento is an abomination, but Clojure would have been a tough sell there since it has no shopping cart app on Github. On Sunday, May 3, 2015 at 8:03:43 PM UTC-4, James Reeves wrote: > > On 4 May 2015 at 00:51, Jason Whitlark <ja...@whitlark.org <javascript:>> > wrote: >> >> While I agree that g vim's metrics aren't terribly meaningful, the >> conclusion he's arriving at is an important one. I've heavily used Clojure >> in production for years, and there have been a number of times where having >> to hand assemble everything cost lots of support from other engineers. >> Luminus is an improvement, but doesn't always generate correct code for >> specific sets of options, and is tricky to extend. >> > > I don't disagree. Improving code generation was my motivation for writing > lein-generate, and my partial motivation for cljfmt. > > - James > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
