On 4 May 2015 at 00:02, gvim <gvi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I posted some figures at the beginning of this thread where I was > comparing frameworks, not components. A framework is more than the sum of > it's components so I don't think comparing Ring and Compojure to Phoenix or > Play is relevant. Clojure frameworks aren't the only ones built from > components.
So you're using measurements that are clearly biased toward monolithic codebases, and you've discovered that Clojure, a language that has few monolithic codebases, is underrepresented? - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
