On Jan 20, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Anthony Grimes wrote:
>
>
> In closing, I propose the following. If we're going to continuously deny
> people things they are accustomed to, instead of treating them like angry
> children having tantrums, why don't we get a response from clojure/core and
> have it displayed prominently somewhere would-be contributors
> can see it? The page should at least explain:
>
> * Why we use Jira
> * Why we only accept Jira patches
> * Why contribution processes like those adopted by organizations and
> companies like Mozilla are not acceptable
Anthony and others:
I've spent some time creating a new page that might be a start at addressing
some of these questions, and perhaps could be pointed at when this topic arises
again. I don't expect it gives satisfying answers to all of your questions
above at this time, but it can be enhanced if desired.
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Brief+description+of%2C+and+FAQs+about%2C+the+Clojure+contribution+process
The best answer I know of for why Clojure only accepts JIRA patches is that
Rich Hickey prefers them, as given on a link on that page now, and which I gave
earlier in this thread. He says it saves him time compared to github pull
requests, for example. If you want to know in detail *why* it saves him time,
I don't have an answer for that question.
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
