It makes more sense to compare language projects. I note that ClojureScript does about as well as Scala in this comparison and much better than CoffeeScript. Scala and CoffeeScript use pull requests.
I also do not like JIRA. But I think the happiness of contributing to ClojureScript far outweighs the tedium of JIRA and the quality of the contributions back this up. On Sunday, January 20, 2013, Brandon Bloom wrote: > There are 176 forks on GitHub. Even assuming that all 51 contributors have > a public fork (most probably do), that's 125 potential contributors > unaccounted for. Only 29% of those forks account for an accepted > contribution. What portion of the remainder might have been contributors? > > I was curious if 29% was "good" in comparison to other projects on GitHub. > I also have never written a Ring/Compojure app, so I took 2ish hours and > threw a little toy together and seeded it with some "interesting" > repositories from GitHub's "explore" feature. > > Code: https://github.com/brandonbloom/cvf > Running: http://boiling-inlet-6842.herokuapp.com/ > > Feel free to add some repositories to it, but please try not to break it. > It's not exactly robust :-) > > In short, 29% seems pretty reasonable for the number of forks > ClojureScript has. Obviously that percentage goes down as the number of > forks goes up, so some normalization would need to occur. > > Of note, technomancy/leiningen scores 49% for 331 forks. That's pretty > *awesome*. Good job guys! > > On Saturday, January 19, 2013 10:00:22 PM UTC-8, David Nolen wrote: >> >> I have nothing to add to this thread beyond pointing out that >> ClojureScript has had _51_ contributors in the short year and a half of its >> existence: http://github.com/**clojure/clojurescript/graphs/** >> contributors<http://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/graphs/contributors> >> . >> >> Via JIRA. >> >> David >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to > clojure@googlegroups.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'clojure@googlegroups.com');> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
