On Sunday, January 20, 2013 11:33:56 AM UTC-6, Fogus wrote: > > > >> To make matters worse, Clojure/core consistently avoids discussing these >> issues in public >> > > I would guess because their position hasn't changed since the last time. > This is only speculation. A page like what Anthony proposes could help, > but it wouldn't satisfy everyone. Stuart Sierra wrote up something > related, but it doesn't cover everything discussed here > http://clojure.com/blog/2012/02/17/clojure-governance.html >
Well, no, if the answer remains the same it probably won't satisfy everyone, but at least they'll have an easy way to learn why. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
