On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's the answer to why the main artifact is called "clojure-lang" not
> just "clojure". It's do differentiate Rich's framework,
> "clojure-lang", from the Contrib librarys ("clojure-contrib") even
> though they are both in the same Maven group.
Please excuse me, as I am just now trying to get used to Maven, so I'm
still learning all the conventions.
Wouldn't the fact that their artifact id's are different clearly
differentiate the two? That's certainly how it works everywhere else.
Is there some sort of Maven rule that I just don't know about that
having an artifact id that is a derivative of another id in the same
group implies some sort of inheritance or something?
If not, we should just get it changed to 'clojure', so it's in line
with the project name, and the same name for the jars as the official
ant script.
Unless you have some reason why it's bad.
Daniel E. Renfer
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
