On Nov 1, 7:33 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you really sure you want/need to use the Common Public License for > your > language? The biggest problem I see with this license is that it is > not > compatible with the GPL. This means a lot to many people and I would > hate to > see you have to wasted time with discussing license issues when a new > license > would avoid all these problems.
For the reasons of maintaining the balance in the universe, let me add another input on this matter: 1. Judging from the quality and reasoning behind Clojure I trust the author to have put enough thought into the choice of the licence. 2. I personally dislike GPL (maybe because it makes some people start hating something). And even then I'm not going around and telling other people to change the licence of their software. 3. If GPL is incompatible with other licences, what's the reason to embrace it? That's not going to solve anything because the next person will come and tell that GPL is the wrong choice since it is incompatible with CPL. If the choice of the licence bothers you, go have some beer. Like i have :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
