Push away :)

Yeh the area range command just threw back an error when trying to summarize
to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.

So how about something liek this:

router ospf 1
 log-adjacency-changes
 area 1 nssa default-information-originate
 area 1 filter-list prefix TotStubSim in
 network 10.0.12.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
 network 10.0.13.1 0.0.0.0 area 1
!
ip prefix-list TotStubSim seq 5 deny 0.0.0.0/0


That should be about the same as using the "no-summary" keyword.

Jason

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>wrote:

> I'm trying to push you in the right direction here about the alternate
> solutions to the same problem... :-)
>
> You will find that you will have no luck with "area range" injecting
> the default. You need to resort to some other solutions.
>
> So, to make things simple - the goal is to "emulate" totally stubby
> NSSA without declaring the area as such - so no "no-summary" allowed
> :-)
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: [email protected]
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 07:10, J D'Silva <[email protected]> wrote:
> > When you make an area "no-summary" it effectively creates the ultimate
> > summary and injects that instead of any other type 3 summary routes that
> may
> > exist.
> >
> > So following that logic I think Marko that you maybe are hinting at
> creating
> > a default route using the area range command instead of using the
> > "no-summary" keyword.  Boith of those should create a type 3 default
> route
> > while preventing any other type 3 routes from entering the area.
> However, I
> > would think that using the area range command could still allow type 4
> LSAs
> > into the area and therefore it wouldn't be exactly the same thing...
> I'll
> > have to lab that up today if I get time.
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Suppressed by what? Which process replaces those summary routes?
> >>
> >> Is there any other way to configure similar behavior without resorting
> >> to configuring area as NSSA, while having the exact same effect?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >>
> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >>
> >> Mailto: [email protected]
> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:44, Dwann Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > surpressed
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Marko Milivojevic <
> [email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Can you expand on "replaced by"? :-)
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> >> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >> >>
> >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >> >>
> >> >> Mailto: [email protected]
> >> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >> >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:11, Rogelio Gamino <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> In a totally stubby NSSA area the summary routes will be replaced by
> a
> >> >>> default route originated/injected by the ABR? Anything else?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Apr 28, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:58, J D'Silva <[email protected]>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>> That's a good point Roy.  I don't think I'd call that paranoid,
> I'd
> >> >>>>> call
> >> >>>>> that a legitimate technicality.  Thanks for your input.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> We can take this up further... Is there a real technical difference
> >> >>>> between NSSA and "Totally Stubby NSSA"? What's the difference
> between
> >> >>>> the two?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> >> >>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Mailto: [email protected]
> >> >>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >> >>>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> >> >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >> >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >> >>>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> >> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >> >>
> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>
> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to