>I'm trying to push you in the right direction here about the alternate >solutions to the same problem... :-)
Hi Marko, I just have to say after following this thread, I really like how you don't just give the answers. I see the spoon feeding happening all the time and yes it helps and saves time, however this makes you really understand IMHO. It's helps others (i know it does for me) when you don't give the answer, but do more like a proctor would (with a little more help of course lol). Makes my wheels turn and tends to stick with me in remembering issues that pop up like this. Just wanted to comment on your postings to the list. Your a great mentor!! Thanks, Max On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm trying to push you in the right direction here about the alternate > solutions to the same problem... :-) > > You will find that you will have no luck with "area range" injecting > the default. You need to resort to some other solutions. > > So, to make things simple - the goal is to "emulate" totally stubby > NSSA without declaring the area as such - so no "no-summary" allowed > :-) > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture > > Mailto: [email protected] > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 07:10, J D'Silva <[email protected]> wrote: > > When you make an area "no-summary" it effectively creates the ultimate > > summary and injects that instead of any other type 3 summary routes that > may > > exist. > > > > So following that logic I think Marko that you maybe are hinting at > creating > > a default route using the area range command instead of using the > > "no-summary" keyword. Boith of those should create a type 3 default > route > > while preventing any other type 3 routes from entering the area. > However, I > > would think that using the area range command could still allow type 4 > LSAs > > into the area and therefore it wouldn't be exactly the same thing... > I'll > > have to lab that up today if I get time. > > > > Jason > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Suppressed by what? Which process replaces those summary routes? > >> > >> Is there any other way to configure similar behavior without resorting > >> to configuring area as NSSA, while having the exact same effect? > >> > >> -- > >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > >> > >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture > >> > >> Mailto: [email protected] > >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:44, Dwann Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > surpressed > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Marko Milivojevic < > [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> Can you expand on "replaced by"? :-) > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > >> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > >> >> > >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture > >> >> > >> >> Mailto: [email protected] > >> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > >> >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:11, Rogelio Gamino <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> In a totally stubby NSSA area the summary routes will be replaced by > a > >> >>> default route originated/injected by the ABR? Anything else? > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Sent from my iPhone > >> >>> > >> >>> On Apr 28, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected] > > > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:58, J D'Silva <[email protected]> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> That's a good point Roy. I don't think I'd call that paranoid, > I'd > >> >>>>> call > >> >>>>> that a legitimate technicality. Thanks for your input. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> We can take this up further... Is there a real technical difference > >> >>>> between NSSA and "Totally Stubby NSSA"? What's the difference > between > >> >>>> the two? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> -- > >> >>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > >> >>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > >> >>>> > >> >>>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Mailto: [email protected] > >> >>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > >> >>>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ > >> >>>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >> >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >> >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >> >>> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com > >> >> > >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > >> >> > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > >> visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
