If there is a way I haven't found it yet.  Although I haven't had a lot of
time to look at this in the last couple days...

Jason

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Christophe Lemaire <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The closest I can go is to have a default with metric-type N1, so that
> the metric increase like with the inter-area default route of a
> totally NSSA... And to filter out all the prefixes advertised to the
> NSSA...
>
> router ospf 1
>  log-adjacency-changes
>  area 1 nssa default-information-originate metric-type 1
>  area 1 filter-list prefix TotStubSim in
>
> ip prefix-list TotStubSim seq 5 deny 0.0.0.0/0 le 32
>
> Do you really think it is possible to get a Type3 default without the
> no-summay keyword?
>
> Regards,
> Christophe
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Lab it up... :-)
> >
> > [ close, but not quite ]
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >
> > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >
> > Mailto: [email protected]
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:53, J D'Silva <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Push away :)
> >>
> >> Yeh the area range command just threw back an error when trying to
> summarize
> >> to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.
> >>
> >> So how about something liek this:
> >>
> >> router ospf 1
> >>  log-adjacency-changes
> >>  area 1 nssa default-information-originate
> >>  area 1 filter-list prefix TotStubSim in
> >>  network 10.0.12.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
> >>  network 10.0.13.1 0.0.0.0 area 1
> >> !
> >> ip prefix-list TotStubSim seq 5 deny 0.0.0.0/0
> >>
> >>
> >> That should be about the same as using the "no-summary" keyword.
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to push you in the right direction here about the alternate
> >>> solutions to the same problem... :-)
> >>>
> >>> You will find that you will have no luck with "area range" injecting
> >>> the default. You need to resort to some other solutions.
> >>>
> >>> So, to make things simple - the goal is to "emulate" totally stubby
> >>> NSSA without declaring the area as such - so no "no-summary" allowed
> >>> :-)
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> >>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >>>
> >>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >>>
> >>> Mailto: [email protected]
> >>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 07:10, J D'Silva <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> > When you make an area "no-summary" it effectively creates the
> ultimate
> >>> > summary and injects that instead of any other type 3 summary routes
> that
> >>> > may
> >>> > exist.
> >>> >
> >>> > So following that logic I think Marko that you maybe are hinting at
> >>> > creating
> >>> > a default route using the area range command instead of using the
> >>> > "no-summary" keyword.  Boith of those should create a type 3 default
> >>> > route
> >>> > while preventing any other type 3 routes from entering the area.
> >>> > However, I
> >>> > would think that using the area range command could still allow type
> 4
> >>> > LSAs
> >>> > into the area and therefore it wouldn't be exactly the same thing...
> >>> > I'll
> >>> > have to lab that up today if I get time.
> >>> >
> >>> > Jason
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Marko Milivojevic <
> [email protected]>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Suppressed by what? Which process replaces those summary routes?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Is there any other way to configure similar behavior without
> resorting
> >>> >> to configuring area as NSSA, while having the exact same effect?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> >>> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >>> >>
> >>> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Mailto: [email protected]
> >>> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >>> >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:44, Dwann Hall <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> >> > surpressed
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Marko Milivojevic
> >>> >> > <[email protected]>
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >> Can you expand on "replaced by"? :-)
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> >>> >> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Mailto: [email protected]
> >>> >> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >>> >> >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:11, Rogelio Gamino <[email protected]
> >
> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> In a totally stubby NSSA area the summary routes will be
> replaced
> >>> >> >>> by a
> >>> >> >>> default route originated/injected by the ABR? Anything else?
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> On Apr 28, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Marko Milivojevic
> >>> >> >>> <[email protected]>
> >>> >> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:58, J D'Silva <
> [email protected]>
> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>>>> That's a good point Roy.  I don't think I'd call that
> paranoid,
> >>> >> >>>>> I'd
> >>> >> >>>>> call
> >>> >> >>>>> that a legitimate technicality.  Thanks for your input.
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>> We can take this up further... Is there a real technical
> >>> >> >>>> difference
> >>> >> >>>> between NSSA and "Totally Stubby NSSA"? What's the difference
> >>> >> >>>> between
> >>> >> >>>> the two?
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>> --
> >>> >> >>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> >>> >> >>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>> Mailto: [email protected]
> >>> >> >>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >>> >> >>>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
> training,
> >>> >> >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >>> >> >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
> training,
> >>> >> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >>> >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> >>> >> please
> >>> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >>> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to