Lab it up... :-) [ close, but not quite ]
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture Mailto: [email protected] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:53, J D'Silva <[email protected]> wrote: > Push away :) > > Yeh the area range command just threw back an error when trying to summarize > to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0. > > So how about something liek this: > > router ospf 1 > log-adjacency-changes > area 1 nssa default-information-originate > area 1 filter-list prefix TotStubSim in > network 10.0.12.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 > network 10.0.13.1 0.0.0.0 area 1 > ! > ip prefix-list TotStubSim seq 5 deny 0.0.0.0/0 > > > That should be about the same as using the "no-summary" keyword. > > Jason > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I'm trying to push you in the right direction here about the alternate >> solutions to the same problem... :-) >> >> You will find that you will have no luck with "area range" injecting >> the default. You need to resort to some other solutions. >> >> So, to make things simple - the goal is to "emulate" totally stubby >> NSSA without declaring the area as such - so no "no-summary" allowed >> :-) >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >> >> Mailto: [email protected] >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 07:10, J D'Silva <[email protected]> wrote: >> > When you make an area "no-summary" it effectively creates the ultimate >> > summary and injects that instead of any other type 3 summary routes that >> > may >> > exist. >> > >> > So following that logic I think Marko that you maybe are hinting at >> > creating >> > a default route using the area range command instead of using the >> > "no-summary" keyword. Boith of those should create a type 3 default >> > route >> > while preventing any other type 3 routes from entering the area. >> > However, I >> > would think that using the area range command could still allow type 4 >> > LSAs >> > into the area and therefore it wouldn't be exactly the same thing... >> > I'll >> > have to lab that up today if I get time. >> > >> > Jason >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Suppressed by what? Which process replaces those summary routes? >> >> >> >> Is there any other way to configure similar behavior without resorting >> >> to configuring area as NSSA, while having the exact same effect? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> >> >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >> >> >> >> Mailto: [email protected] >> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:44, Dwann Hall <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > surpressed >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Marko Milivojevic >> >> > <[email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> Can you expand on "replaced by"? :-) >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> >> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> >> >> >> >> >> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >> >> >> >> >> >> Mailto: [email protected] >> >> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> >> >> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:11, Rogelio Gamino <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> In a totally stubby NSSA area the summary routes will be replaced >> >> >>> by a >> >> >>> default route originated/injected by the ABR? Anything else? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Apr 28, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Marko Milivojevic >> >> >>> <[email protected]> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:58, J D'Silva <[email protected]> >> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>>> That's a good point Roy. I don't think I'd call that paranoid, >> >> >>>>> I'd >> >> >>>>> call >> >> >>>>> that a legitimate technicality. Thanks for your input. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> We can take this up further... Is there a real technical >> >> >>>> difference >> >> >>>> between NSSA and "Totally Stubby NSSA"? What's the difference >> >> >>>> between >> >> >>>> the two? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> -- >> >> >>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >> >> >>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Mailto: [email protected] >> >> >>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> >> >>>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ >> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> >> please >> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
