-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bottom line now is that we've had HOW many e-mails go back and forth without you sending any relevant or on-topic information? I'd still be willing to take a crack at whatever is bothering you (despite the fact that you suggested I was lacking in intelligence), should any of it be relevant to my knowledge. You could keep this going back and forth until someone gets fed up with you and moderates your comment off of the list, or you could just send the information (like you were clearly asked to do) and get on with solving your problem.
The same people do not read the bug reports as read the mailing list. I would have thought that this would have been fairly obvious. That is unlikely to change just to make life simpler for you. I personally submit bug reports (very occasionally), I do not read them. And FYI, ignoring a simple request to provide information, and then flaming people on the mailing list for pointing it out is not MY idea of polite. Hope this helps, ---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 Jo Rhett wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Ryan Novosielski wrote: >>>> "Send them the information you have provided here." >>>> >>>> Something tells me something is missing from this e-mail. ;) If not, >>>> then I can completely understand why the bug report was closed. ;) > > On Jul 20, 2006, at 12:44 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> While it is expected that sometimes users are frustrated, upset, or >> don't like >> our responses, everyone on this list is trying to be helpful. Many of >> them, >> including myself don't have much time, so our answers are sometimes >> short and >> summary, but we try to remain polite. I would appreciate it if you >> would do >> the same. > > The response quoted above was not trying to be helpful. It was caustic > and sarcastic, and was *NOT* polite. Perhaps you should have fixed the > To: header on your e-mail before sending it? > > --Jo Rhett > senior geek > Silicon Valley Colocation > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFExnjDmb+gadEcsb4RAnclAJ9NHVl3JGSaGnySb/Rhdqd0XEVFCQCeLS7W arVrVBnJt84JiwK6C3Fg0P0= =vvVY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
