On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:33 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote:
> >> 2942 was just amended when i Deputized Assessor, it's contents no longer
> >> delay anything, and it's got a different name.
> >
> > Oh well shoot, I searched recent past on the term 2942 which isn't used
> > in the proposal. Serves me right for trying to be clear by putting rule
> > title as well as number. :P
> >
> > Well, it's still a dictatorship, looks like, so needs repealing.
> >
> > Of course, the ability to *withdraw* a proposal is not included in the
> > Agency...
> >
> >
>
> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following document: {{There
> is no proposal with the title "Throw off Your
> Chains", and any entity which would otherwise be such a proposal is
> not a proposal.}}
>
> -Aris
>
If it's a proposal, i can withdraw it as I submitted it, so I'm likely
going to object and just remove the proposal from the pool shortly. I just
want it to exist for a moment to ensure I understand the state of the world.
