On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 16:05 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > > That's the problem I was trying to solve with my ratification, by > > just destroying the thing before the ambiguity created an unnecessary > > mess. However, I missed this bit of rule 2466 "When an action is > > performed on behalf of a principal, then the action is considered for > > all game purposes to have been performed by the principal." Not very > > ambiguous. The author is Quazie. > > I missed that too, but counterarguments: I admit not as plausible now, > but if you say "G. submitted it via the Agency, which caused Quazie to > create it" results in "G. is the author" via the definition of author in > the rules. > IIRC, I ruled a while back that Agoran Decisions work like that (i.e. the author of an Agoran Decision is the player who had the most creative input into the way the decision started). I can't even remember why I was ruling on that, now.
-- ais523
