On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:28 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote: > > 2942 was just amended when i Deputized Assessor, it's contents no longer > > delay anything, and it's got a different name. > > Oh well shoot, I searched recent past on the term 2942 which isn't used > in the proposal. Serves me right for trying to be clear by putting rule > title as well as number. :P > > Well, it's still a dictatorship, looks like, so needs repealing. > > Of course, the ability to *withdraw* a proposal is not included in the > Agency... > > Well it's not any more, all e has is the power to give out Black Ribbons and destroy the rule. I'll leave the proposal around as the CFJs are interesting, but that rule will be gone before the proposal in question pends I believe.
