On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote: > 2942 was just amended when i Deputized Assessor, it's contents no longer > delay anything, and it's got a different name. Oh well shoot, I searched recent past on the term 2942 which isn't used in the proposal. Serves me right for trying to be clear by putting rule title as well as number. :P Well, it's still a dictatorship, looks like, so needs repealing. Of course, the ability to *withdraw* a proposal is not included in the Agency...
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Quazie
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Quazie
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Alex Smith
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Ørjan Johansen
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Alex Smith
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Quazie
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Alex Smith
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Alex Smith
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs Kerim Aydin