I am not very good at people either, so I completely understand and actually didn't feel patronised at all.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > No harm no foul - and it was a good reminder to me as well to give the > rules a full read through if i'm gonna be attempting to muck about. > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 15:42 Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@ > gmail.com> wrote: > >> Okay, good. Sorry to bother you then. You were just asking a lot of >> questions, but I suppose I do too. Apologies if I came across as >> patronizing. I'm not really very good with people. >> >> -Aris >> >> On Apr 16, 2017 3:38 PM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" < >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> I have fully read about all of the offices and deputisation. I read the >> whole ruleset in January and I have skimmed it after joining. >> >> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@ >> gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'd suggest reading the rules. Skimming them at least. I know the >>> ruleset is long, but it's a good way to get started. At least look at the >>> ones on deputizaton. >>> >>> -Aris >>> >>> On Apr 16, 2017 3:32 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> My belief is that getting it wrong is more productive than doing >>>> nothing at all - I personally haven't read the rules on deputising - but if >>>> your interpretation says you can - try it - if your wrong you'll learn >>>> something, and will have caused some amount of forward momentum. >>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 15:27 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Correct me, if I am wrong, but I could deputise to resolve the >>>>> election. >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Resolution hasn't occurred so the results aren't 'real' yet AFAIK >>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 15:20 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Would this constitute grounds for a claim of error in the recent >>>>>>> ADoP meta report given it listed the position of referee as vacant. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Aris Merchant < >>>>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I believe there's something allowing a player to become judge of a >>>>>>>> CFJ without objection, which I intend to use. Your CFJ invitation was >>>>>>>> probably ambiguous, meaning it may be invalid. In any case, Publius >>>>>>>> initiated one. There was an election for Referee, but the ADoP never >>>>>>>> resolved it. o won it though. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Aris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:59 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In 2015 I joined and left in a single message on BAK due to a >>>>>>>> similar ping. That was mostly silly, and the CFJ on it just reaffirmed >>>>>>>> announcement and the fact that BAK channels are indeed public. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I truly am not certain if I could give Murphy the rights I gave, >>>>>>>> but that shouldn't stop me from making actions in either reality. The >>>>>>>> interesting bit is if my potential CFJ isn't assigned within the week, >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> it turns out it was a real CFJ, then the Arbitor has failed at eir >>>>>>>> duties >>>>>>>> and should at least be issued a Green Card for a reasonable failure of >>>>>>>> their duties. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also the Referee's office is vacant - but should be filing weekly >>>>>>>> cards for all the reports gone missing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am going to draft a few referee proposals for automatic card >>>>>>>> filings for missed reports at the end of each month I think. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:46 Aris Merchant < >>>>>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Probably a different variety of paradox. This seems new. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Aris >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:43 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This I think is new though - giving someone else the power to >>>>>>>>>> make me a player? Maybe not - if I did this years ago then the CFJ >>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>> be easily resolvable by precisent. >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:42 Aris Merchant < >>>>>>>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah. I've seen the BAK archives. You've done this before. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Aris >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:40 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not a paradox - there's a super position of state in the world >>>>>>>>>>>> right now, but if someone else CFJs on if i'm a player, the >>>>>>>>>>>> resolution of >>>>>>>>>>>> that CFJ collapses the reality of this message and the one and >>>>>>>>>>>> only truth >>>>>>>>>>>> appears. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to do that if you'd like. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I quite enjoy making actions like this as I join the game - I >>>>>>>>>>>> believe I have a history of akward joins. >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:22 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>>>>>>>>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this not paradoxical given the need for a CFJ to occur to >>>>>>>>>>>>> establish whether you are a player and therefore to resolve these >>>>>>>>>>>>> conundra? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming I am a player: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I flip my budget switch in all Open charters to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>> highest allowable value. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the cumulative total of all of my budget switches is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> greater than 100 and that the office today for superintendent is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vacant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Superintendent - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I am running for the office of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Superintendent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming I am currently not running for any office and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the office of the prime minister is vacant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prime minister - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I am running for Prime Minister. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming I am not a player: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I CFJ on the statement "Quazie is a player." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Quazie (who will be using this email alias predominantly) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >> >>
