E appears to specialize in paradoxes. -Aris
On Apr 16, 2017 2:22 PM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Is this not paradoxical given the need for a CFJ to occur to establish > whether you are a player and therefore to resolve these conundra? > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Assuming I am a player: >> I flip my budget switch in all Open charters to their highest >> allowable value. >> -------- >> >> Assuming the cumulative total of all of my budget switches is greater >> than 100 and that the office today for superintendent is currently vacant. >> I announce that I would like to start an election for the >> Superintendent - and ask for 4 support. >> I announce that I am running for the office of Superintendent. >> -------- >> >> Assuming I am currently not running for any office and that the office of >> the prime minister is vacant. >> >> I announce that I would like to start an election for the Prime >> minister - and ask for 4 support. >> I announce that I am running for Prime Minister. >> -------- >> >> Assuming I am not a player: >> I CFJ on the statement "Quazie is a player." >> >> -Quazie (who will be using this email alias predominantly) >> > >