Okay, good. Sorry to bother you then. You were just asking a lot of questions, but I suppose I do too. Apologies if I came across as patronizing. I'm not really very good with people.
-Aris On Apr 16, 2017 3:38 PM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: I have fully read about all of the offices and deputisation. I read the whole ruleset in January and I have skimmed it after joining. On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@ gmail.com> wrote: > I'd suggest reading the rules. Skimming them at least. I know the ruleset > is long, but it's a good way to get started. At least look at the ones on > deputizaton. > > -Aris > > On Apr 16, 2017 3:32 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> My belief is that getting it wrong is more productive than doing nothing >> at all - I personally haven't read the rules on deputising - but if your >> interpretation says you can - try it - if your wrong you'll learn >> something, and will have caused some amount of forward momentum. >> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 15:27 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> Correct me, if I am wrong, but I could deputise to resolve the election. >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Resolution hasn't occurred so the results aren't 'real' yet AFAIK >>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 15:20 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Would this constitute grounds for a claim of error in the recent ADoP >>>>> meta report given it listed the position of referee as vacant. >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Aris Merchant < >>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I believe there's something allowing a player to become judge of a >>>>>> CFJ without objection, which I intend to use. Your CFJ invitation was >>>>>> probably ambiguous, meaning it may be invalid. In any case, Publius >>>>>> initiated one. There was an election for Referee, but the ADoP never >>>>>> resolved it. o won it though. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Aris >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:59 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> In 2015 I joined and left in a single message on BAK due to a similar >>>>>> ping. That was mostly silly, and the CFJ on it just reaffirmed >>>>>> announcement >>>>>> and the fact that BAK channels are indeed public. >>>>>> >>>>>> I truly am not certain if I could give Murphy the rights I gave, but >>>>>> that shouldn't stop me from making actions in either reality. The >>>>>> interesting bit is if my potential CFJ isn't assigned within the week, >>>>>> and >>>>>> it turns out it was a real CFJ, then the Arbitor has failed at eir duties >>>>>> and should at least be issued a Green Card for a reasonable failure of >>>>>> their duties. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also the Referee's office is vacant - but should be filing weekly >>>>>> cards for all the reports gone missing. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am going to draft a few referee proposals for automatic card >>>>>> filings for missed reports at the end of each month I think. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:46 Aris Merchant < >>>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Probably a different variety of paradox. This seems new. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Aris >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:43 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This I think is new though - giving someone else the power to make >>>>>>>> me a player? Maybe not - if I did this years ago then the CFJ should be >>>>>>>> easily resolvable by precisent. >>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:42 Aris Merchant < >>>>>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah. I've seen the BAK archives. You've done this before. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Aris >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:40 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Not a paradox - there's a super position of state in the world >>>>>>>>>> right now, but if someone else CFJs on if i'm a player, the >>>>>>>>>> resolution of >>>>>>>>>> that CFJ collapses the reality of this message and the one and only >>>>>>>>>> truth >>>>>>>>>> appears. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Feel free to do that if you'd like. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I quite enjoy making actions like this as I join the game - I >>>>>>>>>> believe I have a history of akward joins. >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:22 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>>>>>>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is this not paradoxical given the need for a CFJ to occur to >>>>>>>>>>> establish whether you are a player and therefore to resolve these >>>>>>>>>>> conundra? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming I am a player: >>>>>>>>>>>> I flip my budget switch in all Open charters to their >>>>>>>>>>>> highest allowable value. >>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the cumulative total of all of my budget switches is >>>>>>>>>>>> greater than 100 and that the office today for superintendent is >>>>>>>>>>>> currently >>>>>>>>>>>> vacant. >>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the >>>>>>>>>>>> Superintendent - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I am running for the office of Superintendent. >>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming I am currently not running for any office and that the >>>>>>>>>>>> office of the prime minister is vacant. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the >>>>>>>>>>>> Prime minister - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I am running for Prime Minister. >>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming I am not a player: >>>>>>>>>>>> I CFJ on the statement "Quazie is a player." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Quazie (who will be using this email alias predominantly) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>
