I have attempted to send the registrar report as a deputisation. However, Gmail won't let me. Does anyone know of a workaround?
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I am not very good at people either, so I completely understand and > actually didn't feel patronised at all. > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> No harm no foul - and it was a good reminder to me as well to give the >> rules a full read through if i'm gonna be attempting to muck about. >> >> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 15:42 Aris Merchant < >> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Okay, good. Sorry to bother you then. You were just asking a lot of >>> questions, but I suppose I do too. Apologies if I came across as >>> patronizing. I'm not really very good with people. >>> >>> -Aris >>> >>> On Apr 16, 2017 3:38 PM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" < >>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I have fully read about all of the offices and deputisation. I read the >>> whole ruleset in January and I have skimmed it after joining. >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Aris Merchant < >>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd suggest reading the rules. Skimming them at least. I know the >>>> ruleset is long, but it's a good way to get started. At least look at the >>>> ones on deputizaton. >>>> >>>> -Aris >>>> >>>> On Apr 16, 2017 3:32 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> My belief is that getting it wrong is more productive than doing >>>>> nothing at all - I personally haven't read the rules on deputising - but >>>>> if >>>>> your interpretation says you can - try it - if your wrong you'll learn >>>>> something, and will have caused some amount of forward momentum. >>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 15:27 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Correct me, if I am wrong, but I could deputise to resolve the >>>>>> election. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Resolution hasn't occurred so the results aren't 'real' yet AFAIK >>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 15:20 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>>>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would this constitute grounds for a claim of error in the recent >>>>>>>> ADoP meta report given it listed the position of referee as vacant. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Aris Merchant < >>>>>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I believe there's something allowing a player to become judge of a >>>>>>>>> CFJ without objection, which I intend to use. Your CFJ invitation was >>>>>>>>> probably ambiguous, meaning it may be invalid. In any case, Publius >>>>>>>>> initiated one. There was an election for Referee, but the ADoP never >>>>>>>>> resolved it. o won it though. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Aris >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:59 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In 2015 I joined and left in a single message on BAK due to a >>>>>>>>> similar ping. That was mostly silly, and the CFJ on it just reaffirmed >>>>>>>>> announcement and the fact that BAK channels are indeed public. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I truly am not certain if I could give Murphy the rights I gave, >>>>>>>>> but that shouldn't stop me from making actions in either reality. The >>>>>>>>> interesting bit is if my potential CFJ isn't assigned within the >>>>>>>>> week, and >>>>>>>>> it turns out it was a real CFJ, then the Arbitor has failed at eir >>>>>>>>> duties >>>>>>>>> and should at least be issued a Green Card for a reasonable failure of >>>>>>>>> their duties. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also the Referee's office is vacant - but should be filing weekly >>>>>>>>> cards for all the reports gone missing. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am going to draft a few referee proposals for automatic card >>>>>>>>> filings for missed reports at the end of each month I think. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:46 Aris Merchant < >>>>>>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Probably a different variety of paradox. This seems new. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Aris >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:43 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This I think is new though - giving someone else the power to >>>>>>>>>>> make me a player? Maybe not - if I did this years ago then the CFJ >>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>> be easily resolvable by precisent. >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:42 Aris Merchant < >>>>>>>>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah. I've seen the BAK archives. You've done this before. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Aris >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:40 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a paradox - there's a super position of state in the world >>>>>>>>>>>>> right now, but if someone else CFJs on if i'm a player, the >>>>>>>>>>>>> resolution of >>>>>>>>>>>>> that CFJ collapses the reality of this message and the one and >>>>>>>>>>>>> only truth >>>>>>>>>>>>> appears. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to do that if you'd like. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I quite enjoy making actions like this as I join the game - I >>>>>>>>>>>>> believe I have a history of akward joins. >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:22 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>>>>>>>>>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this not paradoxical given the need for a CFJ to occur to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> establish whether you are a player and therefore to resolve >>>>>>>>>>>>>> these conundra? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Quazie < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming I am a player: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I flip my budget switch in all Open charters to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> highest allowable value. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the cumulative total of all of my budget switches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is greater than 100 and that the office today for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> superintendent is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently vacant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Superintendent - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I am running for the office of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Superintendent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming I am currently not running for any office and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the office of the prime minister is vacant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prime minister - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I announce that I am running for Prime Minister. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming I am not a player: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I CFJ on the statement "Quazie is a player." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Quazie (who will be using this email alias predominantly) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >
