In 2015 I joined and left in a single message on BAK due to a similar ping. That was mostly silly, and the CFJ on it just reaffirmed announcement and the fact that BAK channels are indeed public.
I truly am not certain if I could give Murphy the rights I gave, but that shouldn't stop me from making actions in either reality. The interesting bit is if my potential CFJ isn't assigned within the week, and it turns out it was a real CFJ, then the Arbitor has failed at eir duties and should at least be issued a Green Card for a reasonable failure of their duties. Also the Referee's office is vacant - but should be filing weekly cards for all the reports gone missing. I am going to draft a few referee proposals for automatic card filings for missed reports at the end of each month I think. On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:46 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Probably a different variety of paradox. This seems new. > > -Aris > > On Apr 16, 2017 2:43 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This I think is new though - giving someone else the power to make me a >> player? Maybe not - if I did this years ago then the CFJ should be easily >> resolvable by precisent. >> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:42 Aris Merchant < >> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Yeah. I've seen the BAK archives. You've done this before. >>> >>> -Aris >>> >>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:40 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Not a paradox - there's a super position of state in the world right >>>> now, but if someone else CFJs on if i'm a player, the resolution of that >>>> CFJ collapses the reality of this message and the one and only truth >>>> appears. >>>> >>>> Feel free to do that if you'd like. >>>> >>>> I quite enjoy making actions like this as I join the game - I believe I >>>> have a history of akward joins. >>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:22 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is this not paradoxical given the need for a CFJ to occur to establish >>>>> whether you are a player and therefore to resolve these conundra? >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Assuming I am a player: >>>>>> I flip my budget switch in all Open charters to their highest >>>>>> allowable value. >>>>>> -------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Assuming the cumulative total of all of my budget switches is greater >>>>>> than 100 and that the office today for superintendent is currently >>>>>> vacant. >>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the >>>>>> Superintendent - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>> I announce that I am running for the office of Superintendent. >>>>>> -------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Assuming I am currently not running for any office and that the >>>>>> office of the prime minister is vacant. >>>>>> >>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the Prime >>>>>> minister - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>> I announce that I am running for Prime Minister. >>>>>> -------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Assuming I am not a player: >>>>>> I CFJ on the statement "Quazie is a player." >>>>>> >>>>>> -Quazie (who will be using this email alias predominantly) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>
