Would this constitute grounds for a claim of error in the recent ADoP meta report given it listed the position of referee as vacant.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe there's something allowing a player to become judge of a CFJ > without objection, which I intend to use. Your CFJ invitation was probably > ambiguous, meaning it may be invalid. In any case, Publius initiated one. > There was an election for Referee, but the ADoP never resolved it. o won it > though. > > -Aris > > > On Apr 16, 2017 2:59 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In 2015 I joined and left in a single message on BAK due to a similar > ping. That was mostly silly, and the CFJ on it just reaffirmed announcement > and the fact that BAK channels are indeed public. > > I truly am not certain if I could give Murphy the rights I gave, but that > shouldn't stop me from making actions in either reality. The interesting > bit is if my potential CFJ isn't assigned within the week, and it turns out > it was a real CFJ, then the Arbitor has failed at eir duties and should at > least be issued a Green Card for a reasonable failure of their duties. > > Also the Referee's office is vacant - but should be filing weekly cards > for all the reports gone missing. > > I am going to draft a few referee proposals for automatic card filings for > missed reports at the end of each month I think. > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:46 Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@gmai > l.com> wrote: > >> Probably a different variety of paradox. This seems new. >> >> -Aris >> >> On Apr 16, 2017 2:43 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This I think is new though - giving someone else the power to make me a >>> player? Maybe not - if I did this years ago then the CFJ should be easily >>> resolvable by precisent. >>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:42 Aris Merchant < >>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah. I've seen the BAK archives. You've done this before. >>>> >>>> -Aris >>>> >>>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:40 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Not a paradox - there's a super position of state in the world right >>>>> now, but if someone else CFJs on if i'm a player, the resolution of that >>>>> CFJ collapses the reality of this message and the one and only truth >>>>> appears. >>>>> >>>>> Feel free to do that if you'd like. >>>>> >>>>> I quite enjoy making actions like this as I join the game - I believe >>>>> I have a history of akward joins. >>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:22 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Is this not paradoxical given the need for a CFJ to occur to >>>>>> establish whether you are a player and therefore to resolve these >>>>>> conundra? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Assuming I am a player: >>>>>>> I flip my budget switch in all Open charters to their highest >>>>>>> allowable value. >>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Assuming the cumulative total of all of my budget switches is >>>>>>> greater than 100 and that the office today for superintendent is >>>>>>> currently >>>>>>> vacant. >>>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the >>>>>>> Superintendent - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>>> I announce that I am running for the office of Superintendent. >>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Assuming I am currently not running for any office and that the >>>>>>> office of the prime minister is vacant. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the Prime >>>>>>> minister - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>>> I announce that I am running for Prime Minister. >>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Assuming I am not a player: >>>>>>> I CFJ on the statement "Quazie is a player." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Quazie (who will be using this email alias predominantly) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >
