I believe there's something allowing a player to become judge of a CFJ without objection, which I intend to use. Your CFJ invitation was probably ambiguous, meaning it may be invalid. In any case, Publius initiated one. There was an election for Referee, but the ADoP never resolved it. o won it though.
-Aris On Apr 16, 2017 2:59 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: In 2015 I joined and left in a single message on BAK due to a similar ping. That was mostly silly, and the CFJ on it just reaffirmed announcement and the fact that BAK channels are indeed public. I truly am not certain if I could give Murphy the rights I gave, but that shouldn't stop me from making actions in either reality. The interesting bit is if my potential CFJ isn't assigned within the week, and it turns out it was a real CFJ, then the Arbitor has failed at eir duties and should at least be issued a Green Card for a reasonable failure of their duties. Also the Referee's office is vacant - but should be filing weekly cards for all the reports gone missing. I am going to draft a few referee proposals for automatic card filings for missed reports at the end of each month I think. On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:46 Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@ gmail.com> wrote: > Probably a different variety of paradox. This seems new. > > -Aris > > On Apr 16, 2017 2:43 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This I think is new though - giving someone else the power to make me a >> player? Maybe not - if I did this years ago then the CFJ should be easily >> resolvable by precisent. >> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:42 Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@ >> gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Yeah. I've seen the BAK archives. You've done this before. >>> >>> -Aris >>> >>> On Apr 16, 2017 2:40 PM, "Quazie" <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Not a paradox - there's a super position of state in the world right >>>> now, but if someone else CFJs on if i'm a player, the resolution of that >>>> CFJ collapses the reality of this message and the one and only truth >>>> appears. >>>> >>>> Feel free to do that if you'd like. >>>> >>>> I quite enjoy making actions like this as I join the game - I believe I >>>> have a history of akward joins. >>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 14:22 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is this not paradoxical given the need for a CFJ to occur to establish >>>>> whether you are a player and therefore to resolve these conundra? >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Assuming I am a player: >>>>>> I flip my budget switch in all Open charters to their highest >>>>>> allowable value. >>>>>> -------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Assuming the cumulative total of all of my budget switches is greater >>>>>> than 100 and that the office today for superintendent is currently >>>>>> vacant. >>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the >>>>>> Superintendent - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>> I announce that I am running for the office of Superintendent. >>>>>> -------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Assuming I am currently not running for any office and that the >>>>>> office of the prime minister is vacant. >>>>>> >>>>>> I announce that I would like to start an election for the Prime >>>>>> minister - and ask for 4 support. >>>>>> I announce that I am running for Prime Minister. >>>>>> -------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Assuming I am not a player: >>>>>> I CFJ on the statement "Quazie is a player." >>>>>> >>>>>> -Quazie (who will be using this email alias predominantly) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>
