Is this not paradoxical given the need for a CFJ to occur to establish whether you are a player and therefore to resolve these conundra?
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Assuming I am a player: > I flip my budget switch in all Open charters to their highest > allowable value. > -------- > > Assuming the cumulative total of all of my budget switches is greater than > 100 and that the office today for superintendent is currently vacant. > I announce that I would like to start an election for the Superintendent > - and ask for 4 support. > I announce that I am running for the office of Superintendent. > -------- > > Assuming I am currently not running for any office and that the office of > the prime minister is vacant. > > I announce that I would like to start an election for the Prime minister > - and ask for 4 support. > I announce that I am running for Prime Minister. > -------- > > Assuming I am not a player: > I CFJ on the statement "Quazie is a player." > > -Quazie (who will be using this email alias predominantly) >
