ais523 wrote: > I opine REMAND on CFJ 2809a; everyone, including the original judge, > seems to want more detail in the judgement.
You need to specify with/without prejudice.
ais523 wrote: > I opine REMAND on CFJ 2809a; everyone, including the original judge, > seems to want more detail in the judgement.
You need to specify with/without prejudice.