BobTHJ wrote: > Not that I think you've been unfair, but did you consider my argument > for NOT GUILTY via implicit announcement? The NOVs were announced in > the Insulator report, and by assigning them ID numbers I implicitly > declared their validity. I think this does satisfy the requirement in > the rules.
Yes, but I think "announce" is a higher standard than "indicate" or similar ordinary-language-defined words.
