On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:35 AM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > First, we have to deal with a potential bug in the proposal itself; it > attempts to create a rule, but does not specify its power. However, it > seems reasonable to assume that the rule is created at power 1; although > nowhere in the rules is a default power implied for rules, we know the > rule has a power of at least 1 (rule 2141) and at most 1 (rule 2140). > The only alternative is that the rule was not created at all, which > seems implausible.
R105(a) explictly addresses this.
